Is Congress Taking Action: Or Just Lip Service?

BLM, Bundy Ranch, cattle ranchers, Congress, corruption, DOJ

Thanks to Free Range Report

Scathing letter from Congress to BLM director cites Bundy Ranch debacle, Steinle murder

 

Mr. Brian Steed Acting Director
Bureau of Land Management 1849 C Street, N.W., Room 5665
Washington, D.C. 20240

Dear Mr. Steed,

On January 8, 2018, a federal judge denied prosecutors’ request to retry Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy and his supporters for their actions during a 2014 armed standoff with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This ruling follows a December 20, 2017 decision by the court to declare a mistrial based on federal prosecutors improperly withholding evidence from the defense. The court’s decision follows numerous reports of serious and systemic misconduct by the BLM officials involved in the Bundy case. Of concern, a recent memo from a BLM whistleblower to the Department of Justice (DOJ) appears to show that information regarding extensive misconduct and unprofessional behavior by BLM officials involved in the Bundy case, as well as other relevant information, was knowingly withheld from prosecutors. In this report, the employee alleges a ” widespread pattern of bad judgment, lack of discipline, incredible bias, unprofessionalism and misconduct” exists among senior and supervisory BLM law enforcement officers.

These allegations are alarming for several reasons. First, these  reports appear  to indicate that BLM officials purposefully withheld critical information  from the prosecution and subsequently retaliated  against  the BLM employee who attempted  to bring the withheld information  to the prosecution. In  addition, it is highly unusual  for a federal prosecution to end in  a mistrial  that bars retrying the case. Approximately 91 percent of people charged  with a crime in federal court are found guilty and 77 percent of defendants standing trial are convicted. The failure of prosecutors to achieve a conviction in the Bundy case raises questions about the conduct of BLM law enforcement and their ability to carry out effective, fair, and professional law  enforcement investigations.

The failures in the Bundy case and previous cases display serious misconduct by BLM law enforcement officials, and strongly suggest that there are systemic issues within BLM’s law enforcement operations. Previous Department of the Interior (DOI) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reports, as well as whistleblower accounts, detail a litany of law enforcement problems from poor evidence handling procedures due to a lack of professionalism, and even the deliberate withholding of information from Congress. While many of these reports revolve around a former single BLM law enforcement officer, Dan Love, who abused his authority in multiple instances, misconduct is not exclusive to this one individual. For example, in June 2015, a BLM law enforcement officer failed to adequately safeguard his loaded firearm. The pistol was stolen from a backpack and left in his personal vehicle. This stolen gun was subsequently used in the shooting death of San Francisco resident Kate Steinle. In spite of the incident, rather than facing disciplinary action, the BLM officer whose gun was stolen was promoted to a supervisory role. Just this month, a federal judge allowed a wrongful death lawsuit against the BLM on behalf of Ms. Steinle’s estate to move forward.

These types of examples continue to fuel the concerns of many Americans in the western United States, whose interactions with BLM are frequent and impactful. BLM’ s apparent culture of impunity for law enforcement misconduct is a detriment to the public and those employees committed to ethical service. Both employees and supervisors have a duty to report any wrongdoing and misconduct to ensure a respectful, professional, and safe work environment.

The Committee is encouraged by the work DOI has already initiated to address some of these issues at the agency level, including the emphasis on ensuring retaliation or reprisal for reports of misconduct is not tolerated. We are also hopeful that the new DOI leadership will take action to address the root cause of BLM’s past failures and help restore trust in the bureau’s ability to effectively and fairly enforce the law on federally owned land.

To assist the Committee in its oversight of BLM law enforcement operations and investigations, please provide  a  briefing  to Committee  staff concerning the outcome of  the Bundy case, as well as any updates to BLM policy or guidelines addressing the issues outlined in this letter no later than January 24,  2017.

Please contact the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee staff at (202) 225-7107 with any questions about this request.  Thank you for  your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Committee on Natural Resources

Rob Bishop
Chairman on Natural Resources

Bruce Westerman Chairman
Subcommittee,  Oversight & Investigations

You can see the full letter with footnotes here:  https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/bishop-westerman_ltr_to_blm_re_blm_law_enforcement.pdf

2 thoughts on “Is Congress Taking Action: Or Just Lip Service?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *